It's risky business, your life, your loves, your investments!
Do you remember the 1983 movie, Risky Business? In it, Tom
Cruise plays an enterprising teen named Joel who takes a huge risk
when, with the help of a beautiful young prostitute, he converts his
parents' home to a brothel while they're away on vacation. His
enterprise goes swimmingly well at first, but then goes terribly awry.
Only with luck does Joel avert total disaster and, amazingly, come out
smelling like a rose.
Ahhhh...if life only worked that way. If only we
could take those big risks and have them pay off big, or at least turn
out reasonably well. It's especially tempting to think we might pull
that off with our investments. Maybe get lucky. Or maybe not. Let's not
forget that Risky Business is a Hollywood fiction.
What does all this have to do with building wealth?
Well, if you're serious about getting the wealth you want you're going
to have to come to grips with "risk." Specifically, you'll need to know
the amount of risk in your investments, as well as the amount of risk
you can emotionally tolerate before going sideways. To succeed, you'll
need to balance the two.
Fortunately, knowledge takes you out of the dark and
neutralizes fear. And fear is your worst enemy. In its grip, you can't
make a good decision. That's why today we're going to look at the risk
in our lives and investments, reflect on how we feel about it, and make
a risk-tolerance plan that's both comfortable and effective for the
longer term.
Here's why this is important. Naturally, you're not
going to invest in anything that you know will lead to losses. But,
unavoidably, today's best investments will give you some short-term
losses, and in order to make much larger long-term gains you'll have to
endure them. That's how Dow Double Diamond works. It's what we call taking one step backward before taking two steps forward.
The important thing is to know in advance what
you're dealing with, so you're not taken by surprise and then driven to
mistakes. One of the biggest mistakes is to quit in an emotional moment
when you're upset by losses. Quitting just guarantees that your loss
will be permanent, and it puts you farther from your goal. Fortunately,
preventing this common error is easy when you know in advance just how
much risk you can tolerate.
Life is, as Joel discovered, risky business. You
take risks every time you get into a car. Participate in sports. Or
step out of a shower. Think back: you took a risk when you chose a
college or entered military service; when you decided on a career path;
when you dated; most certainly when you chose a life partner; and of
course with your investments.
There is, indeed, some risk in every action. Most of
us readily accept these everyday risks, but it gets a lot more
complicated when it comes to our money. Money represents freedom,
power, security, even our sense of who we are. We don't want to lose or
diminish these things. But without knowledge, we unwittingly enter into
a kind of emotional mine field. And if we're unaware, quite
unexpectedly our wealth dreams can blow up and vanish into thin air.
We don't want that to happen, so let's get some risk
knowledge, and let's also reflect on how we'll react to short-term
losses. I think we're all willing to endure some short-term downside
risk for a much greater long-term reward, but how much? That's what we
need to find out. Let's look at the risk in some popular investments,
and also gauge the risk-to-reward ratio for Dow Double Diamond.
You're probably not inclined to invest in real
estate. Most experts agree that in recent years a "real estate bubble"
has developed, and in 2006 we could see a popping of that bubble. Once
deflated, it could take years for prices to rebound.
Most likely you are not considering bond
investments. The current rising interest rate climate is unfavorable to
bond prices. And even though the rate hikes will soon come to an end,
it'll be some time before bonds do really well again. And even under
the best of conditions, they don't generate returns that can build
wealth quickly.
Gold and other precious metals are a possibility,
but do you feel comfortable with them? Do you feel you can gamble your
future on them? The problem with this investment class is that it
performs well just once in a while, and then does poorly the rest of
the time. Unless you're an expert in the field, it's just not a
practical wealth-building vehicle.
Buying and holding stocks today is probably way too
risky for you. From 1982 to mid 2000 we saw a great bull market. But
since then, technically speaking, we've been in a bear market. Yes, the
Dow has climbed back pretty close to its 2000 high, but consider that
2005 was a down year. Also consider that many experts are saying that
in 2006 we're likely to see another leg down in what will eventually be
a 10 to 15 year bear market.
And look at this: Since 1929, there have been 8
major bear markets with a 20% decline or more. Had you bought the Dow
at the high just prior to these bear markets, you would've suffered an
average 42.75% decline, and you would've needed an average 82.23 months
just to break even. That's 7 years of making no money for each bear
market, for a total of 56 zero-gain years out of the 76 years since
1929 (so much for the buy-and-hold strategy)!
By contrast, Dow Double Diamond looks
very attractive, and not just this year but every year. I'm biased, of
course, but with this vehicle we don't have to worry about interest
rates, the price of gold, whether corporate profits are good. Whether
the consumer is confident. Whether the real estate market is stretched.
Whether we have war or peace. Or even which way the Dow is headed. None
of that matters because our plan trades in both directions and
profitably captures a majority of the Dow's short-term moves. It's what
we call an "all weather plan."
Still, it would be unfair to talk about major bear markets in the Dow without also considering the major down periods for the Dow Double Diamond. So I asked Jim if he would help us do a "compare and contrast." And here's what he found out...
Jim examined the DDD plan from 1997 through
2005 and noted every drawdown of 4% or more. Why start at 1997 and use
only a 4% or greater loss? First, 1997 is the furthest year back for
which we have accurate data, and looking back any farther would be
inappropriate anyway, since Jim designed the DDD plan for the modern period (Dow above 5,000). Second, for those trading DDD
with 5x leverage, a 4% cash loss represents a 20% leveraged loss, and
that matches the "20% or more" bear market criteria we're using for the
Dow.
Okay, since 1997 the DDD plan had 10 declines
of 4% or more. The average loss was 10.9% and it took 7.26 months to
recover back to the break-even point. Now, let's make a straight-up
cash comparison: While Dow investors needed 7 years to make up an
average 43% bear-market loss, DDD investors needed 7 months to make up an average 11% bear-market loss.
Expressed another way, The DDD plan has shown
itself to be 4 times more favorable than buying-and-holding the Dow on
losses. And 12 times more favorable on break-even time. I think we can
take those stats to the bank.
But what about leverage? At 2x, the DDD
plan's 10.9% drawdown becomes 21.8%. At 3x it becomes 32.7%. And at 5x,
it becomes 54.5%. If you're using leverage, that's what you'll have to
endure. And for what gain? (update: nearly 4-year returns, combining
back-tested and live trading results from July 2002 thru April of 2006,
show compound annual growth rates of 34%, 52%, and 86% for DDD at 2x, 3x, and 5x investing respectively).
Keep in mind that, while back-tested and past
results are not necessarily indicative of future returns, all of our
stats show the greatest DDD returns were produced by the 5x
trading despite the drawdowns. The second greatest returns were
produced by the 3x trading despite the drawdowns. The 3rd best returns
were produced by the 2x trading despite the drawdowns. And the 4th best
returns were produced with 1x, or straight cash trading.
As you can see, higher gains come with leverage, and
the highest gains come with the highest leverage. But bigger drawdowns
also come with leverage. And you can't get the greater 2x, 3x, and 5x
returns without also enduring their higher drawdowns, as well as the
average 7-month recovery time to break even.
Can you do it? Only you can answer that question.
Obviously, if you quit in an emotional moment before your account has a
chance to recover, you lose. But if you persevere, history is on your
side to go on to attain the potentially very high annual DDD returns that will build the fortune you want, and probably a lot faster than most other investments.
Think it over. With reflection and your newfound
knowledge, you might find that some of your fears are unfounded. You
might discover you can handle more short-term risk than you previously
thought you could. Or you may discover you've been taking too much risk
and need to make an adjustment.
Look at the numbers and ask yourself, What size loss
can I emotionally endure? What approach will enable me to persevere so
that I can attain the DDD returns I need to reach my goal on time?
Once you have the answer, you can choose a DDD
allocation plan (among the 2x, 3x, and 5x approaches) that you can
comfortably live with. One that will enable you to continue with the
plan through good months and bad, until the day you arrive at your
wealth goal.
To sum up, you need to know the risk in your
investments, and you need to know your emotional risk tolerance. When
you know those two things--and you act according to this
knowledge--you'll be giving yourself the greatest chance for success.
For you, life may be still be risky business, but like the movie
character, Joel, you'll come out smelling like a rose!
Happy New Year! I'll see you next month.
Sincerely,
Dick Sanders
Dick Sanders was the publisher of Dow Double
Diamond from November 2004 through January 2006. He wrote this article during
that time. Mr. Sanders is no longer affiliated with Dow Double Diamond, Tame
Trading, or affiliate companies.
|